Comments on: Abusing The System, or Due Process?

By: Danielle Foster

Danielle Foster — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:38:14 +0000

Trey, are you the same Trey Garrison who wrote the book about beating your speeding ticket? If so I would appreciate if you would contact me as I am having difficulty with your site. Thanks.

By: Bear

Bear — Sat, 11 Apr 2009 20:29:03 +0000

But Trey, if you don’t do so, you’re not contributing your fair share.

By: Trey Garrison

Trey Garrison — Sat, 11 Apr 2009 17:25:19 +0000

To Ed Cognoski:

But what about the right to not incriminate yourself? Be it coercion by force or coercion from “social obligation” no one should be compelled to plead guilty. If you know the state cannot, or through its own broken mechanism, will not prove its case against you, you have no obligation to make the case for the state against yourself, IMHGDO.

By: Tiki

Tiki — Sat, 11 Apr 2009 16:15:57 +0000

You have an interesting style. I submitted posts to TransparentVoices.com
I hope they posts for others to follow

By: Traffic Lawyers

Traffic Lawyers — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:55:22 +0000

The traffic ticket system isn’t about justice. It’s about revenue. The guy is just fighting to minimize his taxes. More people should. Then the system would crash, they’d have to raise revenue in more honest ways, and guys like me would be out of business. I’m okay with that.

By: Ed Cognoski

Ed Cognoski — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:56:21 +0000

“Innocent until proven guilty” is how the state views a defendant. The defendant himself knows whether or not he’s guilty of, say, speeding. If he’s guilty, he ought to own up and pay his fine. Exploiting the system to escape the consequences is not justice.

By: Bethany

Bethany — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:19:09 +0000

As usual, Blow shows that he doesn’t really ever check anything out, or even flesh it out before writing. It’s like whatever he mused about on his drive from Sunnyvale gets regurgitated into a column.