What the Global Warming Fundies Really Want

Pretty much everything you need to know about the real agenda of the man-made global warming fraud is right here.

It’s not about pollution control, carbon control, emissions control, or temperature control.

global_warmingIt’s about control. And global wealth redistribution.


From the very earliest age, we should make environmental awareness a major theme of education and a major theme of political debate, until respect for the environment comes to be as fundamental as safeguarding our rights and freedoms. By acting together, by building this unprecedented instrument, the first component of an authentic global governance, we are working for dialogue and peace.

A climate change response must have at its heart a redistribution of wealth and resources.

We’ve got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing — in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.

Man-made global warming is the “intelligent design” of the left — discredited pseudo-science that hides their real agenda.



  1. Frank R says:

    I am constantly amazed at the people who swallow this, yet can’t really explain the science other than CO2 goes up so does temperature. They don’t bother to understand that the only evidence comes from computer models that have proven to be inaccurate and do not mimic the actual climate. What is further astounding is that people have no understand that on variable is incapable of driving the climate as the AGW crowd says it does. Al Gore aught to be put on trial for perpetrating one of the biggest frauds in history and making a bundle in doing so.

  2. Bear says:

    Ya know what’s even worse, some of the people I know who know about such things say that the trends over the last 100 years actually indicate that CO2 goes up in response to temperature increase, and not the reverse. Something to do with increasing use of temperature control in buildings….

  3. Bob says:

    “Man-made global warming is the “intelligent design” of the left — discredited pseudo-science that hides their real agenda.”

    Wow, Trey discovered our real agenda! Guess we’ll have to work faster now to get all that wealth redistributed before Trey and the ‘libertarians” get their real agenda enacted.

  4. Don in Austin says:

    You’re just skeered they’ll put a carbon tax on ammo.

    Far too much of the denier literature isn’t peer reviewed science, but opinion. Good strategy, it worked great for the tobacco companies. Politicizing the issue has also been good strategy, especially for the energy companies. Sun caused warming has been debunked in the scientific literature, btw, if you care to look it up.

    Taxing carbon only works if the $ are invested in developing alternatives. Economics drives the consumption. Consumers will choose alternatives only when they become cheaper than the current fossil fuel based systems. If its more expensive consumers won’t want it, pollution or sea-level be damned.

  5. Trey Garrison says:

    Don’t think you’re right, Don, re: the effect of the sun, but I always appreciate your perspective and insight into an opposing POV.

  6. Bear says:

    The science of the “deniers” is, if anything, subjected to far greater scrutiny and review than that of those who are proponents of anthropogenic climate change. If the pro-global warming scientists WERE getting the same level of scrutiny as the “deniers,” then there would be far more of their studies being found to be flawed, irrelevant, or outright fraudulent.