<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Compelling Profile of Rand Paul in&#8230;Salon?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.treygarrison.com/2010/05/compelling-profile-of-rand-paul-in-salon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.treygarrison.com/2010/05/compelling-profile-of-rand-paul-in-salon/</link>
	<description>Plausibly Undeniable</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 03:57:22 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: keith johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.treygarrison.com/2010/05/compelling-profile-of-rand-paul-in-salon/comment-page-1/#comment-10349</link>
		<dc:creator>keith johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 14:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.treygarrison.com/?p=2817#comment-10349</guid>
		<description>Rand&#039;s victory last night ought to be a wake up call to the RINOS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rand&#8217;s victory last night ought to be a wake up call to the RINOS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: towski</title>
		<link>http://www.treygarrison.com/2010/05/compelling-profile-of-rand-paul-in-salon/comment-page-1/#comment-10348</link>
		<dc:creator>towski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 16:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.treygarrison.com/?p=2817#comment-10348</guid>
		<description>If your political philosophy has a hard time finding someone to describe it without sounding kooky, doesn&#039;t that imply a certain level of kookiness in your philosphy?

Ducks and covers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your political philosophy has a hard time finding someone to describe it without sounding kooky, doesn&#8217;t that imply a certain level of kookiness in your philosphy?</p>
<p>Ducks and covers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJ</title>
		<link>http://www.treygarrison.com/2010/05/compelling-profile-of-rand-paul-in-salon/comment-page-1/#comment-10347</link>
		<dc:creator>CJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 14:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.treygarrison.com/?p=2817#comment-10347</guid>
		<description>Rand might be the &quot;missing link&quot; in Libertarianism - he espouses libertarian principles without sounding like a kook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rand might be the &#8220;missing link&#8221; in Libertarianism &#8211; he espouses libertarian principles without sounding like a kook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Rand Paul became the Tea Party&#8217;s Obama &#124; Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.treygarrison.com/2010/05/compelling-profile-of-rand-paul-in-salon/comment-page-1/#comment-10342</link>
		<dc:creator>How Rand Paul became the Tea Party&#8217;s Obama &#124; Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 15:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.treygarrison.com/?p=2817#comment-10342</guid>
		<description>[...] Compelling Profile of Rand Paul in…Salon? — Trey Garrison [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Compelling Profile of Rand Paul in…Salon? — Trey Garrison [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spinnikerca</title>
		<link>http://www.treygarrison.com/2010/05/compelling-profile-of-rand-paul-in-salon/comment-page-1/#comment-10340</link>
		<dc:creator>spinnikerca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 03:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.treygarrison.com/?p=2817#comment-10340</guid>
		<description>Ron Paul has no &#039;baggage in his past&#039;.  The most that can be said is that he KNEW some people in his past who might have had baggage, but that is not at all the same thing.

Regardless, Rand hasn&#039;t had people calling him a kook for 30 years while he was the only one standing up against special interests, before other people realized anything was untowards in the way our government was being operated.  I have no problem with Rand, and Ron would have to be forced to run for higher office -- he doesn&#039;t like doing it, and isn&#039;t as young as he once was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Paul has no &#8216;baggage in his past&#8217;.  The most that can be said is that he KNEW some people in his past who might have had baggage, but that is not at all the same thing.</p>
<p>Regardless, Rand hasn&#8217;t had people calling him a kook for 30 years while he was the only one standing up against special interests, before other people realized anything was untowards in the way our government was being operated.  I have no problem with Rand, and Ron would have to be forced to run for higher office &#8212; he doesn&#8217;t like doing it, and isn&#8217;t as young as he once was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

